User reviews

Reza Nov 22, 2025

Waste of money

Maha F. Nov 22, 2025

wrong format. It should be email.

Yi Z. Nov 22, 2025

Not meet my requirement at all

Melei A. Nov 22, 2025

I was very displeased. There were multiple grammatical errors as well as reuse of many sentences. I made a 60. I learned a valuable lesson for sure. For what I payed for the service, this was a terrible paper.

Karl L. Nov 22, 2025

Hello! I think the writer misunderstood the guiidelines. The research should focus on the article i attached and look for similar studies made prior to the date of publication so all studies before 2014 and that mention the same health issue which is infant malnutrition in low income households

Xingyu Nov 22, 2025

Before she stated, she asked me to extend the deadline and I did. She provided me with the first part of the paper. When I reviewed it, there is no change. When I Told her that. She saiad “sorry i pasted the wrong document”. Then she asked me “could you please add me another hour”. She wasted my time.I wish I could get part of my money back.

Iris Nov 22, 2025

Plagiarized and used bad information on paper. Answers were wrong. Do not use!!!!

Deborah Nov 19, 2025

it its low quality, needs a lot of editing to make ut up to university standard but good foundational work

Rita S. Nov 19, 2025

Not really impressed as did not follow the instructions given.

Amro M. Nov 19, 2025

Didn't proofread before sending final product. Had to point out many things like grammar errors which is expected of the writer to know. However, did try to fix but the improvement was minimal and seemed mediocre. If you have time to talk and fix things go for it, but if you don't be wary.