User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Taif Jul 27, 2025
Grammar was terrible.
Was this review helpful?
(5 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Hind A. Jul 27, 2025
it has been 12 hours since the writer said he would revise the paper.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Hao Q. Jul 27, 2025
No response back I will reassign it to someone else
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Raj C. Jul 26, 2025
Actual research for "research paper' was lacking. Paper was repetitive, definitions of terms were used to fill entire pages instead of applying those terms to the concepts. The majority of the content is lifted from sources and pasted into the paper. I asked the writer to add detail to the core section of the paper and they added more definitions and lists to take of page space.
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Felicia Jul 26, 2025
Rewrite structure horrible uses of word choice
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Keke Jul 26, 2025
Didn’t get it, finished it anywhere near the deadline very incompetent
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Alicia Jul 26, 2025
Didnt follow direction
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Brooke Jul 26, 2025
It wasn't bad but it's not what i asked for, it's really basic and there isn't enough details.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
John Jul 26, 2025
I am 1 hour and 26 minutes away from the deadline and the writer did not respond to my messages or looked at the attachment I sent
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Ying D. Jul 26, 2025
all contents in PPT, the writer seems no idea about how to make a PPT file.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)