User reviews

Jayden Jun 15, 2025

This is a rework of the original paper which was totally off topic of the article I sent him to review.  Sadly, this paper is not much better.  However, he did take the time to rework it and I am sure if it was a different subject maybe it would have been better but I am not pleased at all.

Ziyu G. Jun 15, 2025

Can't handle assignment

Yuwen Jun 15, 2025

Paper did not meet all listed requirements. I had to pay full payment for file for finished paper that did not pass. More revisions would not have fit timeframe when paper was required to turn in..

Vania S. Jun 15, 2025

He was horrible. Didn't follow directions, had to completely redo the assignment making it late. Even after re-do so many content errors as well as syntax and grammar. Also barely answered!

Dylan Jun 15, 2025

Her work helped give me a barely passing grade! I needed a university level book comparison essay and instead she chose children's literature as a book to compare!!!! She failed to discuss the topic and provide relevant information from the novels as it pertains to that topic. Her thesis needed to provide more insight and the 3 supporting points should have examined the points that both novels share with respect to the thesis. I even gave her the rubric for the essay! I'm less than impressed

Himanshu S. Jun 15, 2025

Writer was unable to complete assignment as laid out and requested and went past the set deadline.

Turki Jun 15, 2025

We have to change the paper more than one time with bad resources to provide.

Wonil Jun 15, 2025

Writers sentence structure was terrible and the whole paper sounded like someone from a none English speaking country wrote it. Disappointment! Glad I only spent $36.

Shae P. Jun 14, 2025

I will never work with this writer again. If you are going to take a job. Please has the ability to completed the work on time. My deadline was missed because you took a job that you did understand. Now, I am paying and not getting full credit.

Mary G. Jun 14, 2025

Bad experience. Responds fairly well, but the edits he made to my paper were horrible. Paper did not flow, he made very robotic edits, I dont think he actually read the paper.