User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Michael Apr 28, 2026
Half of the information provided were from 2019, as this was an update for 2020 Q1, which didnt help, as most of the information the writer provided were already mentioned in 2019 Q4 reports, which looked like i was coping information from previous reports, even though i provided the previous 3 Quarters report for the writer to have a look at, but nothing helped, even the title was copied as july 2019 !!!!!,
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Yongjun A. Apr 28, 2026
Horrible writing, super late for a 2 page paper that only summarized an article even though was given more than 2 weeks. DO NOT REQUEST.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Tomas J. Apr 27, 2026
The writer was unable to do my paper and it was already a short deadline and Wasted my time
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Mwamini Apr 27, 2026
The language did not connect with the family structure theory. I received an 11 out of 20 points, bringing my grade down significantly. Very disappointed. Not sure that this paper was reviewed as your advertisement states.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Joy Apr 27, 2026
Only gave two star because he wrote something, however very poorly done. Cannot be used at all, lack of content, poor communication, no knowledge of topic. Promised to fix it, waited but no response. I doubt writer is capable of a redo. Now have to do it myself all over. A waste of resources and time. Never again.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Tim B. Apr 27, 2026
Did not follow instructions and poor quality work.
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Yanhong Apr 27, 2026
The depth and detail is not enough. Need to analyze the deeper meaning of the advertisements and relate them to the 2 key terms - the explanations are very superficial and not sociological.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Jason Apr 27, 2026
Content was okay. Removed 5 stars because proper APA format was not followed and specifically stated. Writer verbalized understanding at the time, but the result is not in APA format.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Latoya F. Apr 27, 2026
did not follow directions and way past the deadline and still not finished as requested.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Antonia N. Apr 27, 2026
This paper was my first paper with you guys and I believe it will be the last one! Your write is not educated enough to help others! If I requested it write to do my paper I trusted that person but the way writing my paper and then telling me to pay more to complete the order right 2 hrs before the dues dates, doesn't look good, and means the write didn't do good writing the paper! This person deserves to be fired and needs to learn how to write paper and how to be responsible!
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)