User reviews

Kermo K. Jun 13, 2024

Rubric and guidelines not fully followed and not enough details or citations.

Elvin Jun 13, 2024

It was not as professional as I expected it to be. Did not fill in all of the areas of the memo provided.

Lei Jun 13, 2024

The level of the selected words was not work or business level and the message was not professional. I think it will be the last time to select this website or service .

Toby Jun 12, 2024

We need to include a section on ‘limitations of the study’. You may include any observed difficulties (response rate, sample size etc. if relevant). Specifically, you can talk about the researcher’s approach towards data analyses (% values) over factorial exploration of survey responses. Making connections between various sections of the report is critical. I hope when you merge these draft versions – we may have an opportunity to explore the cohesiveness of various sections of the report.I am happy to read through your next draft.

Miss helen T. Jun 12, 2024

Writer communication is terrible. Grammar is awful, very disappionted. I'm an honest customer, and I'm going to have to spend another 2 hours correcting the grammatical errors.

Lindsay Jun 12, 2024

Among them, seven resources were not completed according to the requirements I gave. I made a lot of modifications myself in the later period. It's hard for this writer to respond to your questions, and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone. And give low marks.

Daniel I. Jun 12, 2024

Writer said he was familiar with subject but was not.

Steve Jun 12, 2024

The performance was lackluster at best

Jill S. Jun 12, 2024

She couldnt complete the order

Antonio Jun 12, 2024

Did not like the quality of the paper.