User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Julio Dec 19, 2023
the quality of work is deplorable. i gave the writer a chance to correct still sloppy there was way to much broken english this might of been ok for other papers but this was not. i now have to find a new writer or a new website. i should have chosen my first instinct
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Christine B. Dec 19, 2023
writer did not meet deadline
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Jeffrey O. Dec 19, 2023
Had difficulties with the writer on order and revisions. This caused me to make my own revisions to stay on topic. To be fair it can be difficult to know if a writer totally understands what is needed. Though I thought instructions were clear with resources given as well. Writer did provide a revison .
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Vivi Dec 19, 2023
did not write the topic i want him to, he decided for himself which is not acceptable
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Frederick Dec 18, 2023
Late revision deadline, fake reference, poor quality paper.
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Manuel Dec 18, 2023
Doesn't respond to me. Gave him too much time.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Chinye N. Dec 18, 2023
the ppt Was just black and white there was no images nothing paid 148 with tax and quality of paper is not good at all
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Nuri S. Dec 18, 2023
Essay was a little all over the place. not the format I wanted!
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Ali Dec 18, 2023
She doesn't follow instructions, I asked her to change it, but she never did it $80 to the trash. I had to do it myself.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Tammie Dec 18, 2023
Writer misunderstood the necessity of three academic resources per researcher section. That's nine academic resources instead of the three that was included. I will have to rework the paper to meet standard.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)