User reviews

Adrianna Dec 25, 2025

The content was very rough, It helped me save some time, but I had to refine 2/3's of it. I'm slightly dissapointed.

Aeshah Dec 25, 2025

Just look at the video and you will know that is require with the document (lab3)

Margaret Dec 25, 2025

First work submission was almost totally out of topic. He re-wrote it but there are still imperfections and the writing style is everything but perfect. I had to revise it all and apply considerable modifications. Not woth the price.

Daisy R. Dec 25, 2025

They didn't read my instruction I got C on my essay.

Stephen Dec 25, 2025

This is suck

Sarah P. Dec 25, 2025

She isn't following simple directions.

Aven Dec 25, 2025

pretending that she can do it be she couldn't

Saif Dec 25, 2025

PICOT unclear, no numbers of articles returned and no sources used. APA issues noted. That was the feedback I got from this paper. Due to this, it was graded very poorly. Please pay attention on the rubric and details for future paper. Thanks

Ngozi A. Dec 23, 2025

The writer is outstanding but unwilling to make any changes and unrealistic in providing any additional requests of revision that suit both parties.

Jessica G. Dec 23, 2025

The letter doesn't meet my requirement.