User reviews
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Neringa R. Nov 20, 2024
I am not satisfied with the writer because my writing looks exactly like my original writing. He only addressed the grammar which is only part of my request.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Janet A. Nov 20, 2024
This writer is terrible. Told me she would have it done within the deadline, and then told me to cancel the order the day it was due because she couldnt get it done
Was this review helpful?
(4 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Gene Nov 20, 2024
Didn't focus the instruction.
Was this review helpful?
(0 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Ahmed A. Nov 19, 2024
overdue too long time
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Crystal H. Nov 19, 2024
Work wasn't upto the mark
Was this review helpful?
(2 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Paola F. Nov 19, 2024
The writer didn't follow the instructions at all. I try to discuss this with the writer but negative response. I released some amount to the writer just for the effort but I'm so disappointed!!!!
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Ameera Nov 19, 2024
The information was ok , but too little referencing and wrong format as it was a academic poster and he did it in 10 slides.
Was this review helpful?
(3 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Yongjin Nov 19, 2024
He was horrible. Didn't follow directions, had to completely redo the assignment making it late. Even after re-do so many content errors as well as syntax and grammar. Also barely answered!
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Stephan Nov 19, 2024
Was making excuses, and never got it done on time
Was this review helpful?
(7 helpful votes)
Prices
Quality
Delivery
Support
Sang Hoon Nov 19, 2024
I had corrections that had to be made to my paper took over 5 hours for the writer to respond. I missed my deadline and received a zero on my assignment. Paper had grammar issues and transition issues.
Was this review helpful?
(1 helpful votes)